To view graphic version of this page, refresh this page (F5)

Skip to page body
SFGovAccessibility
Seal of the City and County of San Francisco
City and County of San Francisco

November 26, 2002

November 26, 2002

 

SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING COMMISSION



ADDENDUM

SAN FRANCISCO
PLANNING COMMISSION

Meeting Minutes
Commission Chambers - Room 400
City Hall, 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place
Tuesday, November 26, 2002
12:30 PM

PRESENT:           Shelley Bradford Bell; Michael J. Antonini; Kevin Hughes; Sue Lee;
William L. Lee
ABSENT: Edgar E. Boyd; Lisa Feldstein;

MEETING WAS CALLED TO ORDER BY PRESIDENT BRADFOR-BELL AT 12:39 P.M.

STAFF IN ATTENDANCE: Gerald G. Green – Director of Planning; Larry Badiner – Zoning Administrator; Jean Paul Samaha; Jonas Ionin – Acting Commission Secretary; Patricia Gerber – Transcription Secretary

C.          DIRECTOR'S REPORT

4.1.          Informational presentation on Board of Supervisor's legislation which would establish a Special Use District at Fourth Street and Freelon Street. The proposed special use district would permit increased residential density, greater height and create affordable housing. NO ACTION REQUIRED.

SPEAKER(S):
(+) Bill Barnes, Supervisor Daly's Aide
- Gave an overall explanation about the legislation
(+) Sue Hestor
-          Is this legislation consistent with the Housing Element?
-          Housing Element currently is out of compliance with State law, it is a year overdue, and was rejected by the State in October 11, 2002.
-          Is this the best use of this site?
-          Is this project consistent with the conditional use process?
-          This is the first project outside the C-3, that she is aware of, that does not have any bulk limitation over 50 feet
-          This is not the way that the Planning Code is set up to deal with amendments of the Planning Code. Is this a Planning Code amendment?
-          Environmental Review could not start during 90 days, because the project sponsor had not come in with the application that defined the project
-          This is a way to run a railroad, this is not the way to run a Planning Commission
(-) Paul Homechick
-          This legislation does not talk about communication with the community
-          There has not been given any notice to anybody that lives near this project; there has not been meetings, reviews or recommendations by the Planning Commission, Planning Commission should review, and then the legislation should happen, not the other way around.
(+) Sam Dodge
-          There are three important elements of this project:
-          Dense housing/apartment, near transit corridors is a good planning
-          Tax base in this City
-          There is a really a big push in the City to try to provide the people that live here affordable housing
(+) Weldon Jackson
-          We have no affordable housing in the City
-          Supports legislation
(+) Lucian Blazej
-          Supports legislation
(+) Delphine Brady
-          There are twenty thousand people living in the SRO hotels
-          We need to have more affordable housing
(+) Randy Shaw, Tenderloin Housing Clinic
-          Supports legislation
(+) Samuel Lagasca
-          This will be a good project, for many people who have lived in SRO's for many years
(+) Charles Breidinger
-          Developing affordable housing is a very difficult proposition, and developing as a non-profit is even more difficult
-          Urged Commission to support the legislation
(+) Antoneta Stadlman
-          Supports legislation
(+) Joe Cassidy, Project Sponsor
- Asked Commission to support the legislation
(+) Al Markus
- This is by far the best idea that we have seen today
- The best part of the whole idea, is the non-profit agency that will receive this project, will be able to choose the mix and size each unit that best meets each client
(+) Joe O'Donoghue
-          Supports legislation
(+) Sean Keighran
-          The only way to reduce the cost of housing, is to create more housing
-          The proposed project has affordable units, but also offers 330 market rate units, that will be priced at the entry level market rate.
(+/-) Oscar Grande
-           Neither for or against this legislation, needs more information to develop his own analysis
(+) Alice Barkley
-          Supports legislation
(-) Calvin Welch
-          Opposes legislation
(-) Mary Ann Miller
-          Opposes legislation
(+) Otto Duffy
-          Supports legislation
(+) Unknown Speaker
-          Supports legislation
(+) Angelina Lockheed
- Supports legislation


THESE MINUTES WERE PROPOSED FOR ADOPTION AT THE REGULAR MEETING ON THURSDAY, DECEMBER 19, 2002.

SPEAKERS:          None
ACTION:          Approved
AYES:                    Antonini, Boyd, Bradford Bell, Feldstein, Hughes, Sue Lee, William Lee


Last updated: 11/17/2009 10:00:08 PM